Morgan v. Braswell et al
| Valda Morgan |
| Ray Braswell, Roger Rutherford, Denton Independent School District, School Board Trustees, Jill Watkins, Paige Boroughs, Christene Vaughn and Jamie Wilson |
| 4:2010cv00452 |
| September 8, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Sherman Office |
| Denton |
| Richard A. Schell |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
288
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING 282 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE; denying {284] Motion for Reconsideration filed by Valda Morgan; granting 223 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Denton Independent School District. T he court is further of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the objections are without merit as to the ultimate findings of the Magistrate Judge. The court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions o f the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this court. Therefore, Denton Independent School District's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 223) is GRANTED in its entirety and Plaintiff shall take nothing by any of her claims. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 3/26/2014. (kls, )
|
|
Filing
148
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 131 Motion to Dismiss, 121 Motion to Dismiss, 122 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 3/30/2012. (pad, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
