Aberle v. Saunders MEP, Inc. et al
| Ronald James Aberle |
| Saunders MEP, Inc. and Jonathan P Saunders |
| 4:2010cv00648 |
| November 24, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Sherman Office |
| Collin |
| Amos L. Mazzant |
| Michael H. Schneider |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 20 Report and Recommendations, 14 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Ronald James Aberle Judgment is rendered in favor of Plaintiff against (1) Defendant Saunders MEP, Inc. and Jonathan P. Saunders, jointly and severally, in the amount of $12,199.56 for violations of the FLSA. It is further ORDERED that, based upon Plaintiffs Supplemental Brief Regarding Damages (Dkt. #23), Plaintiff is awarded attorneys fees in the amount of $9,000 against Defendant SaundersMEP, Inc. and Jonathan P. Saunders, jointly and severally. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 7/12/11. (cm, )
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 11 Report and Recommendations, 9 Motion to Dismiss filed by Saunders MEP, Inc., Jonathan P Saunders. Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #8) is DENIED.IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 4/6/11. (cm, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
