Tommy Manion of Texas, Inc., et al v. Green
| Kyle Manion, Tommy Manion of Texas, Inc.. and Tommy Manion |
| Joe Green |
| 4:2012cv00222 |
| April 16, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Sherman Office |
| Denton |
| Don D. Bush |
| Richard A. Schell |
| Recovery of Overpayment and Enforcement of Judgment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 67 Report and Recommendations, GRANTING 50 Motion for Summary Judgment,, filed by Tommy Manion of Texas, Inc.., Tommy Manion, Kyle Manion. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 3/27/2014. (baf, )
|
|
Filing
69
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE - GRANTING 51 Motion to Dismiss the Counterclaims and Affirmative Defendants of Counter-Plaintiff/Defendant, Magic Cross Rancy, LP; GRANTING 52 Motion to Dimiss the Counterclaims and Affirmative Defendants of Counter-Plaintiff/Defendant, Magic Cross Ranch, LP. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 1/30/2014. (baf, )
|
|
Filing
67
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 50 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Tommy Manion of Texas, Inc.., Tommy Manion, Kyle Manion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Don D. Bush on 1/23/2014. (baf, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
