Escamilla v. M2 TECHNOLOGY, INC. et al
Plaintiff: David Escamilla
Defendant: M2 TECHNOLOGY, INC. and Does 1-20
Case Number: 4:2012cv00634
Filed: October 5, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Sherman Office
County: Collin
Presiding Judge: Don D. Bush
Presiding Judge: Richard A. Schell
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 124 ORDER AFFIRMING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S JANUARY 26, 2015 AND JULY 10, 2015 ORER AND MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 93 Motion for Summary Judgment. Further it is ordered that, before filingany other suits in this District against M2 Technology, Inc., David Escamilla must first seek leave of court to do so. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 9/29/2015. (pad, )
August 31, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 120 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 93 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support Thereof filed by M2 TECHNOLOGY, INC.. Within fourteen (14) days after service of the magistrate judges report, any party may serve and file written objections to the findings and recommendations of the magistrate judge. 28U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(C). Signed by Magistrate Judge Don D. Bush on 8/31/15. (cm, )
December 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 82 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 6 Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by David Escamilla, 3 Motion for Preliminary filed by David Escamilla. The court has made a de novo review of the objections raised by Plaintiff a nd Defendant's response and is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the objections are without merit as to the ultimate findings of the Magistrate Judge. The court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this court. Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkts. 3 & 6) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 12/5/2013. (kls, )
August 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 58 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by David Escamilla, 3 MOTION Application for Injunctive Relief re 1 Complaint filed by David Escamilla. Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkts. 3 & 6) should be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Don D. Bush on 8/26/2013. (kls, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Escamilla v. M2 TECHNOLOGY, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Escamilla
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M2 TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Represented By: John Frederick Bufe
Represented By: John T Gabrielides
Represented By: Nathan O Greene
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-20
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?