Dannelly v. USA
Michael Eugene Dannelly |
USA |
4:2013cv00438 |
August 2, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Sherman Office |
Grayson |
Don D. Bush |
Richard A. Schell |
Mandamus & Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of United States Magistrate Judge.ORDERED that the above-styled petition for writ of mandamus is hereby DISMISSED as moot. Finally, it is ORDERED that any and all other motions which may be pending in this civil action are hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 6/23/2015. (pad, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Dannelly v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Michael Eugene Dannelly | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: USA | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.