Jefferson v. Fannie Mae et al
| Keitha Jefferson |
| Fannie Mae and Melissa D. Tonn |
| 4:2013cv00604 |
| October 10, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Sherman Office |
| Collin |
| Ron Clark |
| Amos L. Mazzant |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
130
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, for 111 Report and Recommendation. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this Cou rt is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant Melissa Tonn's Re-Urged Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #94) be DENIED AS MOOT, Defendant Melissa Tonn's Amended Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Comply with Court Orders (Dkt. #97) be GRANTED, and each of Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Melissa Tonn be DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 9/21/2016. (kls, )
|
|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 37 MOTION for Recusal filed by Keitha Jefferson. Based on the foregoing, the Court finds Plaintiff's Motion to Recuse Judge (Dkt. #37) is hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 6/10/2015. (kls, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
