Taylor v. Education Credit Management Corp. et al
Raymond E Taylor |
Education Credit Management Corp., Dick Boyle, Robert A Stein, Steve Bumbaugh, Department of Treasury, Financial Management Service and US Department of Education |
4:2014cv00615 |
September 24, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Sherman Office |
Dallas |
Don D. Bush |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 55 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Because the Court finds that this case should be dismissed, Plaintiff cannot show a likelihood of success on the merits and his requests for an injunction (Dkt. 34) or grant of summary judgment (Dkts. 37 & 53) are DENI ED. And, because the Court has found that no federal question has been stated based on Plaintiff's factual allegations here, all other relief requested by Plaintiff (Dkts. 50 & 51) is DENIED as MOOT. Defendant Educational Credit Management Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted (Dkt. 39) and Defendants U.S. Department of Education and U.S. Department of Treasury's Motion to Dismiss f or Insufficient Service of Process, for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, and for Failure to State a Claim (Dkt. 41) are GRANTED, and this case is dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim. Signed by Magistrate Judge Don D. Bush on 8/10/2015. (kls, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.