Coralli et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
| Brent Coralli, Sting Soccer Operations Group LP, Sting Soccer Foundation, Sting Sports Group LLC, Sting Group Holdings LLC, Coralli Family Limited Partnership LTD, Texas Titans FC LLC, Royal Nation LLC and Vola LLC |
| JPMorgan Chase Bank NA |
| 4:2015cv00127 |
| February 23, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Sherman Office |
| Collin |
| Amos L. Mazzant |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
116
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion to Designate Responsible Third Party by Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Dkt. 113 ) is CONDITIONALLY DENIED. It is further ORDERED that Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. be given the opportunity to replead facts sufficient to support the alleged responsibility of Brent Coralli. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 9/22/2016. (baf, )
|
|
Filing
95
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Strike Experts (Dkt. 63 ) is hereby GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Carrubbas report should be stricken to the extent that it references the Regulation CC or the conversion claim, which have been dismissed (Opinion Two and Opinion Three). Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 8/4/2016. (baf, )
|
|
Filing
93
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s Motion to Strike Expert Testimony of Christopher Kelly (Dkt. 48 ) is hereby GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Christopher Kellys expert report i s stricken as to the violation of the Regulation CC claim (Opinion 3).It is further ORDERED that Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.s Motion to Strike Expert Testimony of Barry Bell (Dkt. 49 ) is hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 8/2/2016. (baf, )
|
|
Filing
87
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - It is therefore ORDERED that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 64 ) is hereby GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.It is further ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. 65 ) is here by DENIED. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiffs claims are DISMISSED with prejudice as to the following: (1) conversion; (2) tortious interferencebanking; (3) violation of regulation CC; (4) defamation; and (5) negligence. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 7/20/2016. (baf, )
|
|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM OPINION - DENYING 11 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank NA. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 7/24/2015. (baf, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
