Cruz v. Johnson
Josephine Cruz |
Jed Johnson |
4:2015cv00302 |
May 1, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Sherman Office |
Collin |
Amos L. Mazzant |
Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
05 U.S.C. ยง 7703 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - It is therefore ORDERED that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 31 ) is hereby GRANTED IN PART and Plaintiffs claim for hostile work environment is hereby DISMISSED. The remainder of Defendants motion is hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 11/29/2016. (baf, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cruz v. Johnson | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Josephine Cruz | |
Represented By: | John Evan Richards |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Jed Johnson | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.