Creswell Holdings LLC v. Lenovo (United States) Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Fifth Circuit Texas Eastern District Creswell Holdings LLC v. Lenovo (United States) Inc.

Creswell Holdings LLC v. Lenovo (United States) Inc.

Plaintiff:	Creswell Holdings LLC
Defendant:	Lenovo (United States) Inc.
Case Number:	4:2015cv00407
Filed:	June 16, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office:	Sherman Office
County:	Collin
Presiding Judge:	Amos L. Mazzant
Nature of Suit:	Patent
Cause of Action:	35 U.S.C. § 271
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 6, 2016	Filing 53 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Before the Court are Plaintiff Creswell Holdings LLCs Opening Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. 34 ), Defendant Lenovo (United States) Inc.s Response to Plaintiffs Construction Brief (Dkt. 42 ), and Plaintiffs Reply Clai m Construction Brief (Dkt. 45 ). Also before the Court are the parties March 17, 2016 Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement (Dkt. 33 ) and the parties August 16, 2016 Joint Claim Construction Chart (Dkt. 49 ). The Court held a claim co nstruction hearing on August 30, 2016, to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in United States Patent Nos. 6,194,677 (the 677 Patent), 6,318,695 (the 695 Patent), and 6,340,803 (the 803 Patent). The Court issues this Claim C onstruction Memorandum and Order and hereby incorporates-by-reference the claim construction hearing and transcript as well as the demonstrative slides presented by the parties during the hearing. For the following reasons theCourt provides the const ructions set forth below.The Court adopts the constructions set forth in this opinion for the disputed terms of the patents-in-suit. The parties are ordered that they may not refer, directly or indirectly, to each others claim construction positions in the presence of the jury. Likewise, the parties are ordered to refrain from mentioning any portion of this opinion, other than the actual definitions adopted by the Court, in the presence of the jury. Any reference to claim construction proceedings islimited to informing the jury of the definitions adopted by the Court. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 9/6/2016. (baf, )
February 16, 2016	Filing 30 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - DENYING 20 MOTION to Transfer to the Eastern District of North Carolina filed by Lenovo (United States) Inc. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 2/16/2016. (baf, )

Date Filed

Document Text

September 6, 2016

Filing 53 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Before the Court are Plaintiff Creswell Holdings LLCs Opening Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. 34 ), Defendant Lenovo (United States) Inc.s Response to Plaintiffs Construction Brief (Dkt. 42 ), and Plaintiffs Reply Clai m Construction Brief (Dkt. 45 ). Also before the Court are the parties March 17, 2016 Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement (Dkt. 33 ) and the parties August 16, 2016 Joint Claim Construction Chart (Dkt. 49 ). The Court held a claim co nstruction hearing on August 30, 2016, to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in United States Patent Nos. 6,194,677 (the 677 Patent), 6,318,695 (the 695 Patent), and 6,340,803 (the 803 Patent). The Court issues this Claim C onstruction Memorandum and Order and hereby incorporates-by-reference the claim construction hearing and transcript as well as the demonstrative slides presented by the parties during the hearing. For the following reasons theCourt provides the const ructions set forth below.The Court adopts the constructions set forth in this opinion for the disputed terms of the patents-in-suit. The parties are ordered that they may not refer, directly or indirectly, to each others claim construction positions in the presence of the jury. Likewise, the parties are ordered to refrain from mentioning any portion of this opinion, other than the actual definitions adopted by the Court, in the presence of the jury. Any reference to claim construction proceedings islimited to informing the jury of the definitions adopted by the Court. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 9/6/2016. (baf, )

February 16, 2016

Filing 30 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - DENYING 20 MOTION to Transfer to the Eastern District of North Carolina filed by Lenovo (United States) Inc. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 2/16/2016. (baf, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Creswell Holdings LLC v. Lenovo (United States) Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Creswell Holdings LLC
Represented By:	Neal Massand
Represented By:	Stevenson Moore, V
Represented By:	Hao Ni
Represented By:	Timothy Tiewei Wang
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Lenovo (United States) Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?