Smith v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
| Linda Denise Smith |
| JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation |
| 4:2015cv00682 |
| October 5, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Sherman Office |
| Denton |
| Christine A. Nowak |
| Amos L. Mazzant |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.Having considered Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. #49), each of Plaintif's timely filed objections (Dkt. #50), Defendants&# 039; response (Dkt. #52), Plaintiff's reply and amended reply (Dkts. #54-55), and having conducted a de novo review, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrat e Judge's report (Dkt. #46) as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Dkt. #7) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend (Dkt. #49) is DENIED. All relief not previously granted is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 9/19/2016. (kls, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
