Daniels v. Texas Department of Transportation
||Jeffery B Daniels
||Texas Department of Transportation
||October 13, 2015
||US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
||Amos L. Mazzant
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 6, 2017
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration [Dkt. 74 ] and Defendants Motion for Reconsideration [Dkt. 75 ] are hereby DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 1/6/2017. (baf, )
|December 10, 2016
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court finds that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. 30] should be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART and that Defendants' Motion to Strike [Dkt. 45] should be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 12/10/2016. (kkc, )
|December 2, 2016
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 50 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction as to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint filed by Texas Department of Transportation, 17 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Texas Department of Transportation. For the foregoing reasons, the Court finds that Defendants' First Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. 17] should be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Defendants' First Motion to Dismiss should be DENIED as to the 12(b)(6) Arg ument and as to the Immunity Arguments, DENIED AS MOOT as to the Section 1981 Argument, and GRANTED as to the Statute of Limitations Argument. The Court further finds that Defendants' Second Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. 50] should be DENIED. Acco rdingly, it is therefore ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Dismissal [Dkt. 17] is hereby GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART and that Defendants' Motion for Partial Dismissal under Rule 12(b)(1) [Dkt. 50] is hereby DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 12/2/2016. (kls, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?