FLST, Ltd et al v. Explorer Pipeline Company
Plaintiff: |
FLST, Ltd, FLCT, Ltd and FLSC, Ltd |
Defendant: |
Explorer Pipeline Company |
Case Number: |
4:2016cv00017 |
Filed: |
January 5, 2016 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Office: |
Sherman Office |
County: |
Denton |
Presiding Judge: |
Don D. Bush |
Presiding Judge: |
Ron Clark |
Nature of Suit: |
Torts to Land |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
August 25, 2017 |
Filing
73
ORDER AND OPINION ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE PLAINTIFF'S EXPERT STEVE LAWRENCE - GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 29 MOTION to Strike Plaintiffs' Expert Steve Lawrence filed by Explorer Pipeline Company. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 8/24/2017. (baf, )
|
May 11, 2017 |
Filing
68
OPINION AND ORDER - DENYING 49 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Explorer Pipeline Company. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 5/11/2017. (baf, )
|
March 13, 2017 |
Filing
57
ORDER AND OPINION - GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 48 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by FLSC, Ltd, FLST, Ltd, FLCT, Ltd. The appropriate date for the damages analysis is February 5, 2001. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 3/10/2017. (baf, )
|
January 26, 2017 |
Filing
38
ORDER AND OPINION ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXLCUDE PLAINTIFFS' EXPERT ANDREW J. MCROBERTS - The Court finds Defendants Motion to Exclude Plaintiff's Expert Andrew J. McRoberts (Dkt. 30 ) is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART. The Cour t finds Defendants motion to exclude Mr. McRoberts report and opinions as to measuring damages is GRANTED. However, the Court finds Mr. McRoberts report and opinions are allowed as to determine whether Plaintiffs mitigated their damages. Further, the Court finds Defendants motion to exclude Mr. McRoberts report and opinions based on reliability is DENIED. Plaintiffs are ORDERED to produce the case studies Mr. McRoberts relied upon in making his report to Defendant within five (5) business days o f the entering of this order. Further, the Court finds Defendants motion to exclude Mr. McRoberts opinion as to the 2001 Amendment is DENIED. Mr. McRoberts is directed to only make assumptions about the 2001 Amendment in order to support his ultimate opinion as to whether Plaintiffs failed to mitigate their damages. Further, the Court finds Defendants motion to exclude Mr. McRoberts purported inspection of the Property is DENIED. Mr. McRoberts report and opinions on the inspection of the Propert y may be used in order to support his opinions as to whether Plaintiffs mitigated their damages. Finally, Plaintiffs moved at the hearing for leave to amend Mr. McRoberts expert report. Plaintiffs shall file a motion for leave to amend Mr. McRoberts expert report within seven (7) days of the entering of this Order, if they wish to do so. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 1/25/2017. (baf, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?