Dorris v. City of McKinney, Texas et al
Plaintiff: Stephen Dorris
Defendant: City of McKinney, Texas, Daniel Kistner and Jose Madrigal
Case Number: 4:2016cv00069
Filed: January 22, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Sherman Office
County: Collin
Presiding Judge: Amos L. Mazzant
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 55 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - It is therefore ORDERED that Defendants Daniel Kistner's and Jose Madrigal's Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 51 ) is hereby GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 7/12/2017. (baf, )
April 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 50 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant Kistner's and Defendant Madrigal's motions to dismiss Plaintiff's claims against them in their individual capacities based on the defense of qualified immunity ( Dkts. #21, #22) are hereby denied. The remainder of Defendant Kistner's and Defendant Madrigal's motions to dismiss were addressed in the Court's October 4, 2016 order (Dkt. #44). Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 4/10/2017. (baf, )
October 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 44 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - It is therefore ORDERED that the Citys Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 20 ) is hereby DENIED in part and GRANTED in part. It is further ORDERED that the Individual Defendants Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint, or in the alternative, Motions for Rule 7(a) Reply (Dkts. 21 , 22 ) are DENIED in part and GRANTED in part. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 10/4/2016. (baf, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dorris v. City of McKinney, Texas et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephen Dorris
Represented By: Matt Bachop
Represented By: Sara A Conrath
Represented By: B Craig Deats
Represented By: Sara Faulman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of McKinney, Texas
Represented By: Thomas Phillip Brandt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Kistner
Represented By: Thomas Phillip Brandt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jose Madrigal
Represented By: Thomas Phillip Brandt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?