Mote v. Walthall

Mote v. Walthall

Plaintiff:	Marcus Mote
Defendant:	Debra Walthall
Case Number:	4:2016cv00203
Filed:	March 23, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office:	Sherman Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	Ron Clark
Nature of Suit:	Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 20, 2017	Filing 72 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 55 ) is hereby GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Court dismisses Plaintiff's equal protection claim and Texas Government Code § 614.021 claim. The remaining claims shall proceed to trial. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 6/20/2017. (baf, )
February 8, 2017	Filing 49 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant's 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss 27 is hereby GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Court hereby dismisses Plaintiff's state law claims against Defendant in her official capacity. As to all other claims, Plaintiff has stated plausible claims to survive a Rule 12 motion. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 2/8/2017. (baf, )

Date Filed

Document Text

June 20, 2017

Filing 72 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 55 ) is hereby GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Court dismisses Plaintiff's equal protection claim and Texas Government Code § 614.021 claim. The remaining claims shall proceed to trial. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 6/20/2017. (baf, )

February 8, 2017

Filing 49 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant's 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss 27 is hereby GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Court hereby dismisses Plaintiff's state law claims against Defendant in her official capacity. As to all other claims, Plaintiff has stated plausible claims to survive a Rule 12 motion. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 2/8/2017. (baf, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mote v. Walthall
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marcus Mote
Represented By:	Christopher D Livingston
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Debra Walthall
Represented By:	Brett Daniel Gardner
Represented By:	Wm Andrew Messer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?