Soniat v. Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
| Shelley Soniat |
| Department of Housing and Urban Development, Don D Bush and Richard Schell |
| 4:2016cv00337 |
| May 20, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Sherman Office |
| Denton |
| Christine A. Nowak |
| Amos L. Mazzant |
| Housing/Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
111
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 106 Report and Recommendations. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #106) as the findings and conclusions of this Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis for Appeal (Dkt. 97 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 2/28/2017. (baf, )
|
|
Filing
92
***PLEASE DISREGARD - INADVERTENTLY DOCKETED IN INCORRECT CASE BY CLERK***MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant Younique, LLCs Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint Under Rule 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(3) 10 is hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 1/9/2017. (baf, ) Modified on 1/9/2017 (baf, ).
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 42 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 1/6/2017. (pad, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
