Morgan v. NTS Architects & Planners, Inc. et al
Jason Morgan |
NTS Architects & Planners, Inc., Western Rim Investors 2013-3, L.P. and Newport Classic Homes, L.P. |
4:2016cv00454 |
June 29, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Sherman Office |
Collin |
Don D. Bush |
Amos L. Mazzant |
Housing/Accommodations |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 133 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 132 . The parties' Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice (Dkt. #131) is GRANTED. This entire action, and all of the claims asserted therein, be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall bear its own costs. All relief not previously granted is hereby DENIED. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 2/7/2018. (rpc, ) |
Filing 125 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. #70) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 12/29/2017. (rpc, ) |
Filing 112 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 85 Report and Recommendations re: 47 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by WW Woodbridge, LP. Western Rim Investors 2013-3, L.P., Newport Classic Homes, L.P. Defendants No-Evidence Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #47) is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 11/30/2017. (cm, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.