Schopp v. Results National LLC
||George Kenneth Schopp
||Results National LLC
||November 18, 2016
||US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
||Kimberly C Priest Johnson
||Amos L. Mazzant
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Statutory Actions
|Cause of Action:
||Federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|October 30, 2018
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 33 Report and Recommendations, GRANTING 23 Motion for Default Judgment filed by George Kenneth Schopp. Plaintiff is awarded statutory damages under 47 U.S.C. §§ 227(b)(1)(A)(iii), 227(c), and 227(b)(3)(C) in the amount of $42,000.00, comprised of $21,000.00, for fourteen willful violations of the TCPA's Do Not Call provisions, and $21,000.00, for fourteen willful violation s of the TCPA's auto-dialer provisions for calls made to cell phones. Additionally, Plaintiff is entitled to an award of attorneys' fees in the amount of $590.00. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 10/30/2018. (baf, )
|December 5, 2017
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 17 Report and Recommendations, re 12 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Results National filed by George Kenneth Schopp, 10 Clerk's Entry of Default filed by Results National LLC . Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment (Dkt. #12) is DENIED, the Clerks Entry of Default (Dkt. #10) is VACATED, and Plaintiff has thirty (30) days from the date of this Memorandum to effectuate proper service of process on Defendant or face dismissal. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 12/5/2017. (cm, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?