Orthosie Systems, LLC v. Rarestep, Inc.
Plaintiff: Orthosie Systems, LLC
Defendant: Rarestep, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2016cv01003
Filed: December 31, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Sherman Office
County: Collin
Presiding Judge: Amos L Mazzant
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 16, 2017 Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Wasif H Qureshi on behalf of Rarestep, Inc. (Qureshi, Wasif)
March 16, 2017 Filing 6 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (baf, )
March 16, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER - Having considered Plaintiff Orthosie Systems, LLC's ("Plaintiff") Motion to Dismiss Defendant Rarestep, Inc. ("Rarestep"), the Court finds that good cause exists for granting the Motion. The motion to Dismiss #4 is GRANTED. All claims asserted by Plaintiff against Defendant Rarestep are hereby dismissed WITHOUT prejudice. Each party will bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. The Clerk is directed to close this civil action. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 3/16/2017. (baf, )
March 14, 2017 Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Rarestep, Inc. Without Prejudice by Orthosie Systems, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Burns, Ronald)
March 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER. NOTICE OF IMPENDING DISMISSAL - The Complaint was filed in this case on December 31, 2016. It appears from the records currently before the Court that Defendant has not yet been served. Moreover, the Court's records indicate that more than 60 days have passed from the filing of the Complaint and/or Notice of Removal in this Court. Therefore, this notice serves to inform Plaintiff that this action shall be dismissed without prejudice as to Defendant after 90 days, in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 (m), as amended effective December 1, 2015. To avoid dismissal pursuant to Rule 4(m), if more than 90 days are necessary for service of process, Plaintiff must execute and file a verified petition regarding service of process on or before March 20, 2017. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 3/10/2017. (baf, )
January 3, 2017 Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Burns, Ronald)
December 31, 2016 Case ASSIGNED to Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (baf, )
December 31, 2016 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Rarestep, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-6091748.), filed by Orthosie Systems, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)(Burns, Ronald)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Orthosie Systems, LLC v. Rarestep, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Orthosie Systems, LLC
Represented By: Ronald William Burns, Jr
Represented By: Mazin Ahmad Sbaiti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rarestep, Inc.
Represented By: Wasif H Qureshi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?