Smith v. City of Princeton Texas et al
Plaintiff: Joyce Ann Smith
Defendant: City of Princeton Texas and Anne Angell
Case Number: 4:2017cv00085
Filed: February 3, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Sherman Office
County: Collin
Presiding Judge: Christine A. Nowak
Presiding Judge: Amos L. Mazzant
Nature of Suit: All Other Real Property
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 148 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING 146 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. It is, therefore, ORDERED that each of Plaintiff Joyce Ann Smith's post-appeal motions, that is, her (1) "Motion for Preliminary Injunction" (Dk t. # 79 ); (2) "Motion for [Rule] 60(B)(3)(6) Vacant [sic] Judgement [sic]" (Dkt. # 82 ); (3) "Motion for 201 D. [sic] Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Fact" (Dkt. # 90 ); (4) "Motion [for] Default Judgment against Responden t First Choice Towing" (Dkt. # 92 ); (5) "Second Motion for Relief from Defendant City of Princeton" (Dkt. # 99 ); (6) "Second Reply Motion [for] Default Judgement [sic] against Respondent First Choice Towing" (Dkt. # 101 ) ; (7) "Second Motion for 201 D. [sic] Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Fact" (Dkt. # 102 ); (8) "Motion of Signing Pleadings, Motions, and Other Papers; Representations to the Court; [and] Sanctions Against the Defendant City of Proi nceton [sic]" (Dkt. # 103 ); (9) "Motion for Failure to Rule on a Motion and Delay the Judgment [under] Rule 53.1" (Dkt. # 110 ); (10) "Opposition Motion to Respondent City of Princeton Counterclaim Re Docket111" (Dkt. #[11 5]); (11) "Motion for Emergency Application for Writ of Mandamus [,] Vacate Judgement [sic], Restraining Order, Fraudulent Representation, Default Judgement [sic] and Preliminary Injunctive Relief" (Dkt. # 125 ); and (12) "Motion to S trike Defendants' Affirmative Allegations and Defenses" (Dkt. # 131 ) are hereby DENIED. It is further ORDERED that Defendant City of Princeton's (1) Motion to Recover Attorney's Fees (Dkt. # 123 ); (2) Motion to Strike (Dkt. # 128 ); (3) Motion for a Telephonic Management Conference (Dkt. # 135 ); and (4) First Supplemental Motion to Recover Additional Attorney's Fees (Dkt. # 138 ) are hereby DENIED. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 7/24/2020. (daj, )
January 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 71 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 67 . ORDERED that Defendant City of Princeton, Texas's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #48) and Motions to Strike Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint (Dkts. #54, #57) are GRANTED, and Plaintiff Joyce Ann Smith's Motion Judgment for A Matter of Law (Dkt. #43) is DENIED. Plaintiff Joyce Ann Smith's claims against the City of Princeton, Anne Angell, and the City of Princeton's Code Enforcement Department are hereby DISMISSED pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) and § 1915 for failure to state a claim. All relief not previously granted is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 1/8/2018. (rpc, )
July 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 44 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 33 Report and Recommendations. It is, therefore, ORDERED that each of Defendants City of Princeton, Texas's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 28 ) and Defendant Anne Angell's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 29 ) are DENIED. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a second amended complaint no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of this Memorandum Adopting Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Failure to amend and cure the deficiencies identified herein could result in Plaintiff's case being dismissed. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 7/18/2017. (baf, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. City of Princeton Texas et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joyce Ann Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Princeton Texas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anne Angell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?