Soniat v. Texas Real Estate Commission et al
Plaintiff: Shelley Soniat
Defendant: Texas Real Estate Commission, Texas Association of Realtors and National Association of Realtors
Case Number: 4:2017cv00166
Filed: March 6, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Sherman Office
County: Denton
Presiding Judge: Kimberly C Priest Johnson
Presiding Judge: Amos L. Mazzant
Nature of Suit: Housing/Accommodations
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 30, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 29 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 6/30/2017. (pad, )
June 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 13 Motion to Dismiss filed by Texas Real Estate Commission, 24 Report and Recommendations. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant TREC's Motion to Di smiss (Dkt. # 13 is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims against Defendant TREC are DISMISSED with prejudice. All relief not previously granted is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civilaction. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 6/5/2017. (baf, )
May 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, for 13 Motion to Dismiss filed by Texas Real Estate Commission, 4 Motion to Dismiss filed by National Association of Realtors, Texas Association of Realtors , 14 Report and Recommendation. ORDERED that Defendants NAR and TAR's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #4) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims against Defendants NAR and TAR are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 5/12/2017. (kls, )
April 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER AND OPINION - The Court finds Plaintiff's Motion for an Attorney (Dkt. 6 ) is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 4/12/2017. (baf, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Soniat v. Texas Real Estate Commission et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shelley Soniat
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Texas Real Estate Commission
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Texas Association of Realtors
Represented By: Kirstie M Simmerman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National Association of Realtors
Represented By: Kirstie M Simmerman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?