Murphy v. ABA Ranch, LLC et al
| Felicia Murphy |
| ABA Ranch, LLC, Roberta Lynn Hawkins and Stephen Reed |
| 4:2017cv00215 |
| March 29, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Sherman Office |
| Denton |
| Amos L. Mazzant |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Plaintiff's request for attorney's fees is GRANTED and Defendant ABA Ranch, LLC is ORDERED to pay the sum of $7,337.50 in attorney's fees to Plaintiff. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 8/29/2019. (rpc, )
|
|
Filing
54
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court hereby SEVERS the claims against Stephen Reed and ABA Ranch, LLC into a separate cause of action. The separate cause of action against Stephen Reed shall continue to be STAYED, pending further Order of the Court. The Court directs the Clerk of this Court to assign a separate case number for Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Stephen Reed. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (Dkt #53) is hereby GRANTED. To determine the amount of attorneys' fees awarded to Plaintiff, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to submit to the Court within seven (7) days of this Order documentation that indicates the hours and billing records of time spent on each task. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 8/2/2018. (daj, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
