Lahman et al v. Cape Fox Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Earline Lahman and Randy Lahman
Defendant: Nationwide Provider Solutions, Cape Fox Corporation, Concentric Methods LLC, Cape Fox Federal Integrators, Cape Fox Professional Services, LLC, Navar Inc., Cape Fox Government Services, Cape Fox Facilities Services, Cape Fox Shared Services, Michael Brown, George Bernardy, William Walker, Bernard Green, Harold Mitchell, Charles Johnson, Clifford Blair and Katherine Milton
Counter_claimant: Cape Fox Corporation
Counter_defendant: Earline Lahman and Randy Lahman
Case Number: 4:2017cv00305
Filed: May 5, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Sherman Office
County: Lamar
Presiding Judge: Amos L. Mazzant
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 148 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and Brief in Support (Dkt. 139 ) is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 4/24/2020. (baf, )
August 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 120 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Defendant William Walker's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Dkt. 115 ) is GRANTED to the extent described herein. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant William Walker are DISMISSED with prejudice, though the Court reserves jurisdiction over these claims for the sole purpose of determining his entitlement to attorney's fees. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 8/15/2019. (baf, )
March 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 116 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Defendants' Motion to Strike or, in the Alternative, Dismiss Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint [Dkt. # 97 ] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiffs claims against Concentric Methods, Cape Fox Fede ral Integrators, Cape Fox Government Services, and Cape Fox Facilities Services remain dismissed and are therefore STRUCK from the Third Amended Complaint. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to terminate these parties as a result. Plaintiffs' claims against Brown, Cape Fox Shared Services, and NAVAR, Inc., however, are properly before the Court. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 3/13/2019. (rpc, )
September 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 111 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. ORDERED that Walker's 96 Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss is hereby DENIED. It is further ORDERED that Walker's 93 Motion to Amend or Supplement the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order on Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss is hereby DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 9/4/2018. (daj, )
June 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 91 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant Clifford Blair's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction or, in the Alternative, Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Alternative Motion for More Definite Statement (Dkt. 64 ) is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Defendant George Bernardy's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction or, in the Alternative, Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Alternative Motion for More Definite Statement (Dkt. 65 ) is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Defendant Katherine Milton's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction or, in the Alternative, Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Alterna tive Motion for More Definite Statement (Dkt. 67 ) is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Defendant Cape Fox Shared Services' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction or, in the Alternative, for Failure to State a Claim and Altern ativeMotion for More Definite Statement (Dkt. 76 ) is GRANTED. It is also ORDERED that Defendant Cape Fox Facilities Services' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction or, in the Alternative, for Failure to State a Claim and Alter native Motion for More Definite Statement (Dkt. 77 ) is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Defendant Cape Fox Government Services' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction or, in the Alternative, for Failure to State a Claim and Alternative Motion for More Definite Statement (Dkt. 78 ) is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Defendant Concentric Methods, LLC's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction or, in the Alternative, for Failure to State a Claim and Alternative Motion for More Definite Statement (Dkt. 79 ) is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Defendant Cape Fox Federal Integrators' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction or, in the Alternative, for Failure to State a Clai m and Alternative Motion for More Definite Statement (Dkt. 80 ) is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Defendant Cape Fox Professional Services Motion to Dismiss for Lack Of Personal Jurisdiction or, in the Alternative, for Failure to State a Cla im and Alternative Motion for More Definite Statement (Dkt. 82 ) is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Defendant Harold Mitchell's Amended Motion to Dismiss for Insufficient Service of Process or, in the Alternative, for Lack Of Personal Jur isdiction or, in the Alternative, Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Alternative Motion for More Definite Statement (Dkt. 72 ) is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Defendant Michael Brown's Motion to Dismiss for Insufficien t Service of Process or, in the Alternative, Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Alternative Motion for More Definite Statement (Dkt. 75 ) is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Defendant Charles Johnson's Motion to Dismiss fo r Failure to State a Claim and Alternative Motion for More Definite Statement (Dkt. 73 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs should file an amended complaint within seven (7) days of this Order. It is further ORDERED that Defendant Navar, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Alternative Motion for More Definite Statement (Dkt. 81 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs should file an amended complaint within seven (7) days of this Order. It is further ORDERED that Defendant Walker's Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. 66 ) is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 6/19/2018. (baf, )
September 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 17 MOTION to Dismiss ALL OTHER DEFENDANTS FOR INSUFFICIENT SERVICE OF PROCESS filed by Cape Fox Corporation. Defendants Cape Fox Corporations Motion to Dismiss for Insufficiency of Process (Dkt. #17) is hereby DENIED and Plaintiffs shall complete service on or before October 31, 2017. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 9/20/17. (cm, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lahman et al v. Cape Fox Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Earline Lahman
Represented By: David Lynn James
Represented By: Russell Matthew Soloway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Randy Lahman
Represented By: David Lynn James
Represented By: Russell Matthew Soloway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nationwide Provider Solutions
Represented By: Talley Ray Parker
Represented By: Katrin U Schatz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cape Fox Corporation
Represented By: Talley Ray Parker
Represented By: Katrin U Schatz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Concentric Methods LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cape Fox Federal Integrators
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cape Fox Professional Services, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Navar Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cape Fox Government Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cape Fox Facilities Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cape Fox Shared Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: George Bernardy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bernard Green
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Harold Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Clifford Blair
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Katherine Milton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: Cape Fox Corporation
Represented By: Talley Ray Parker
Represented By: Katrin U Schatz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Earline Lahman
Represented By: David Lynn James
Represented By: Russell Matthew Soloway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Randy Lahman
Represented By: David Lynn James
Represented By: Russell Matthew Soloway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?