Performance Pulsation Control, Inc. v. Sigma Drilling Technologies, LLC et al
| Performance Pulsation Control, Inc. |
| Sigma Drilling Technologies, LLC, Intrepid Consulting, LLC, Justin Manley, Allison Manley, William Garfield and Pamela Goehring-Garfield |
| 4:2017cv00450 |
| June 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Sherman Office |
| Collin |
| Amos L. Mazzant |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
330
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. It is ORDERED that Advanced Rupture Disk Technology, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. # 226 ) is hereby GRANTED and Plaintiff's Motion to Seal Certain Exhibits to Defendant Advanced Rupture Disk Techno logy, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt # 303 ) is hereby GRANTED. As such, Advanced Rupture Disk Technology, Inc. is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is therefore ORDERED that Exhibit 5, found at Dkt. # 226 , Exhibit 1 at pp. 85-95, w hich is marked as Exhibit 5 to Exhibit A; Exhibit 6, found at Dkt. #226, Exhibit 1 at pp. 96-97, which is marked as Exhibit 6 to Exhibit A; and Exhibit 15, found at Dkt. #226, Exhibit 1 at pp. 115-164, which is marked as Exhibit 15 to Exhibit A, be sealed by the Clerk of the Court. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 3/11/2019. (rpc, )
|
|
Filing
307
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff Performance Pulsation Control, Inc.'s Motion to Compel Defendants to Produce Items Withheld Pursuant to Trade Secret Privilege (Dkt. 195 ) is hereby GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 1/22/2019. (baf, )
|
|
Filing
221
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court finds that the 210 Emergency, Sealed Motion to Quash Eight (8) Non-Party Subpoenas should be DENIED (Dkt. #210). However, the Court modifies the subpoenas to ensure the protection of any potential confidential information. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 10/30/2018. (baf, )
|
|
Filing
190
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court DENIES PPC's 187 Emergency Motion to Quash and Emergency Motion for Protection from Defendants' Subpoena to Fastener. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 9/6/2018. (daj, )
|
|
Filing
145
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendants' Second Motion for Leave to File Counterclaim (Dkt. 128 ) is hereby DENIED. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 5/22/2018. (baf, )
|
|
Filing
97
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - DENYING AS MOOT 80 MOTION for Protective Order Defendants filed by Sigma Drilling Technologies, LLC, Justin Manley, Intrepid Consulting, LLC, William Garfield. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 2/27/2018. (baf, )
|
|
Filing
90
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint to Add Advance Rupture Disk Technology, Inc. (Dkt. #71) is hereby GRANTED. As such, Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. #73) is hereby deemed filed on January 23, 2018. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 2/13/2018. (rpc, )
|
|
Filing
46
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 19 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Sigma Drilling Technologies, LLC, Pamela Goehring-Garfield, Allison Manley, Justin Manley, Intrepid Consulting, LLC. Defendants Rule 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 11/20/2017. (cm, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
