Mesa et al v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
Michael Mesa and Belinda Mesa |
Wells Fargo Bank N.A. |
4:2017cv00532 |
July 31, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Sherman Office |
Collin |
Christine A. Nowak |
Amos L. Mazzant |
All Other Real Property |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 63 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 62 Report and Recommendations, GRANTING 53 Motion to Dismiss filed by Michael Mesa, Belinda Mesa. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 3/4/2018. (baf, ) |
Filing 52 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 51 Report and Recommendations. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (Dkt. 16 ) is DENIED, Defendant Wells Fargo's Motion to Strike (Dkt. 29 ) is GRANTED, and Defendant Wells Fargo's Motions to Dismiss (Dkts. 9 , 34 ) each are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 11/21/2017. (baf, ) |
Filing 24 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE - re 22 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Corrected Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. 18 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 9/7/2017. (baf, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.