Reaves v. Spectrum
Plaintiff: Tuwana Reaves
Defendant: Spectrum
Case Number: 4:2017cv00651
Filed: September 14, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Sherman Office
County: Collin
Presiding Judge: Kimberly C Priest Johnson
Presiding Judge: Amos L. Mazzant
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: Federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. This entire action, and all of the claims asserted therein, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. All relief not previously granted is hereby DENIED. Signed by District Judge Richard A. Schell on 7/16/2018. (rpc, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reaves v. Spectrum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tuwana Reaves
Represented By: Jenny Diane DeFrancisco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Spectrum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?