Wooten v. Roach et al
| Suzanne H. Wooten |
| John Roach, Sr, Christopher Milner, Gregory Abbott, Harry Eugene White and Collin County, Texas |
| 4:2018cv00380 |
| May 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Sherman Office |
| Collin |
| Amos L. Mazzant |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
142
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 135 MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Expert Joseph Brown filed by Collin County, Texas. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 12/9/2021. (daj, )
|
|
Filing
124
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 115 Second Amended MOTION to Dismiss filed by Collin County, Texas. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 4/27/2021. (daj, )
|
|
Filing
93
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendants John Roach, Sr. and Christopher Milner's First Amended Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (Dkt. 59 ) is hereby GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is further ORDERED that Defendant Collin County, Texas' First Amended Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (Dkt. 60 ) is hereby DENIED. It is further ORDERED that Defendants Abbott and White's Motion to Dismiss Putative Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. 61 ) is hereby GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 12/23/2019. (baf, )
|
|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendants John Roach, Sr. and Christopher Milner's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (Dkt. 17 ) is hereby DENIED. The motion is DENIED as to prosecutorial immun ity, statute of limitations, and punitive damages. The remainder of the motion is DENIED as moot at this time. It is further ORDERED that Defendant Collin County, Texas' Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (Dkt. 18 ) is her eby GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion is GRANTED as to punitive damages, and DENIED as to the argument Plaintiff did not plausibly plead a Monell liability claims and the statute of limitations defense. The remainder of the motion is DENIED as moot at this time.It is also ORDERED that Defendant's Abbott and White's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 20 ) is hereby DENIED. The motion is DENIED as to prosecutorial immunity, official immunity, and statute of limitations. The remainder of the motion is DENIED as moot at this time. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 3/27/2019. (baf, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
