Wapp Tech Limited Partnership et al v. Wells Fargo & Co.
Plaintiff: Wapp Tech Limited Partnership and Wapp Tech Corp.
Defendant: Wells Fargo & Co.
Case Number: 4:2018cv00501
Filed: July 16, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Sherman Office
County: Sherman
Presiding Judge: Kimberly C Priest Johnson
Referring Judge: Amos L Mazzant
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Wells Fargo & Co. (rpc, )
July 17, 2018 Opinion or Order In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (rpc, )
July 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Case Assigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III and Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson. (rpc, )
July 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jeffrey G Toler on behalf of Wapp Tech Corp., Wapp Tech Limited Partnership (Toler, Jeffrey)
July 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Wapp Tech Corp., Wapp Tech Limited Partnership (Toler, Jeffrey)
July 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Toler, Jeffrey)
July 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Wells Fargo & Co. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-6856719.), filed by Wapp Tech Limited Partnership, Wapp Tech Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit A, #8 Exhibit B, #9 Exhibit C, #10 Exhibit D, #11 Exhibit E, #12 Exhibit F, #13 Exhibit G, #14 Exhibit H, #15 Exhibit I, #16 Exhibit J, #17 Civil Cover Sheet)(Toler, Jeffrey)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wapp Tech Limited Partnership et al v. Wells Fargo & Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wells Fargo & Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wapp Tech Limited Partnership
Represented By: Jeffrey G Toler
Represented By: Benjamin R Johnson
Represented By: Aakash S Parekh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wapp Tech Corp.
Represented By: Jeffrey G Toler
Represented By: Benjamin R Johnson
Represented By: Aakash S Parekh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?