CAMPOS v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
RICHARD CAMPOS |
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC |
4:2018cv00558 |
August 8, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Sherman Office |
Sherman |
Kimberly C Priest Johnson |
Amos L Mazzant |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Ocwen Financial Corporation, Other Affiliate Ocwen Mortgage Servicing, Inc. for OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC. (Ragan, Adam) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss For Improper Venue or For Transfer to The Northern District Of Texas; Motion to Dismiss For Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; and Motion to Dismiss For Failure To State a Claim by OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC. (Ragan, Adam) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/28/2018: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (rpc, ). |
Filing 4 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC.( Ragan, Adam) |
Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC to 9/28/2018. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( rpc, ) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC. (baf, ) |
Filing 2 NOTICE by RICHARD CAMPOS PLAINTIFFS CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (Manchee, James) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-6889284.), filed by RICHARD CAMPOS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit Exhibit F)(Manchee, James) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (baf, ) |
Case ASSIGNED to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III and REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson. (baf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: CAMPOS v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC | |
Represented By: | Adam Corey Ragan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: RICHARD CAMPOS | |
Represented By: | James J Manchee |
Represented By: | Marilyn Sue Altamira |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.