Pruvit Ventures, Inc. v. Smith
Pruvit Ventures, Inc. |
Amy Smith, . |
4:2018cv00572 |
August 10, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Sherman Office |
Collin |
Amos L Mazzant |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER AND ADVISORY. Plaintiff's amended complaint is due thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Defendant's amended answer is due twenty (20) days from receipt of the amended complaint. Any prior deadline for Defendant's answer shall be extended to the date set by this order. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 9/10/2018. (rpc, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/11/2018. Rule 16 Management Conference set for 10/29/2018 at 10:30 AM in Ctrm 208 (Sherman) before District Judge Amos L. Mazzant III. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 9/7/2018. (rpc, ) |
Filing 5 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Amy Smith. (Slovak, Robert) |
Filing 4 Additional Attachments to Main Document: #1 Notice of Removal.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - Plaintiff's Original Petition, #2 Exhibit Ex. B - Franchise Tax Status, #3 Exhibit Ex. C - Certif. Copy of Court Docket Sheet (with Plaintiff's Original Petition and Def's Original Answer), #4 Exhibit Ex. D - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal)(Hilliard, Chelsea) |
Filing 3 ***ORIGINAL ANSWER FILED IN STATE COURT*** ANSWER to #2 Complaint by Amy Smith.(daj, ) |
Filing 2 ***ORIGINAL PETITION FILED IN STATE COURT***COMPLAINT against Amy Smith, filed by Pruvit Ventures, Inc..(daj, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Amy Smith from 296th JDC, Collin Co, TX, case number 296-03276-2018. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-6894049), filed by Amy Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hilliard, Chelsea) |
Case assigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (daj, ) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (daj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pruvit Ventures, Inc. v. Smith | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Pruvit Ventures, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Carlisle Anthony Braun |
Represented By: | Mark Leo Hill |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Amy Smith, . | |
Represented By: | Robert T Slovak |
Represented By: | Chelsea Leigh Hilliard |
Represented By: | Steven Charles Lockhart |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.