Buholtz v. Texas Department of Transportation
| Kenneth Buholtz |
| Texas Department of Transportation |
| 4:2018cv00734 |
| October 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Amos L Mazzant |
| Christine A Nowak |
| Condemnation |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Kenneth Buholtz. (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(daj, ) |
Filing 9
DEFICIENCY ORDER. ORDERED that the Plaintiff has thirty days from the receipt of this order to fill out, complete, and submit to the Court a standardized general complaint form. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 11/28/2018. (daj, )
|
| Filing 8 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Complaint - Motion for Expeditious Federal Injunctive Relief (Attachments: #1 Notice of Appraised Value)(daj, ) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Allow Supplement by Kenneth Buholtz. (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(daj, ) |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE to #3 Deficiency Order, filed by Kenneth Buholtz. (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Envelope(s))(daj, ) |
| Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Kenneth Buholtz as to #3 Order. (daj, ) |
|
Filing 3
DEFICIENCY ORDER. ORDERED that Plaintiff has thirty days from the receipt of this order to either pay the $400 filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis, along with a certified copy of his trust fund activities. The Clerk shall accept no other documents from Plaintiff until he has complied with this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 10/16/2018. (daj, )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III and Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate referral) (daj, ) |
| Filing 1 (Construed) COMPLAINT for Expeditious Federal Injunctive Relief against Texas Department of Transportation, filed by Kenneth Buholtz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Envelope(s))(daj, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. ***Consent form mailed to plaintiff. (daj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Buholtz v. Texas Department of Transportation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Texas Department of Transportation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kenneth Buholtz | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
