Benson v. Audit Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff: Aaron C. Benson
Defendant: Audit Systems, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2018cv00904
Filed: December 28, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Amos L Mazzant
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER ON CLOSING DOCUMENTS. It is ORDERED that, on or before March 18, 2019, all parties shall submit to the court all papers necessary for the closing of this case and its removal from the active docket of this court. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 2/14/2019. (rpc, )
February 13, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of Settlement by Aaron C. Benson (Volheim, Nathan)
January 29, 2019 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Audit Systems, Inc. to 2/18/2019. 21 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( rpc, )
January 28, 2019 Filing 7 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Audit Systems, Inc..( Strickler, Nicole)
January 28, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Nicole Marie Strickler on behalf of Audit Systems, Inc. (Strickler, Nicole)
January 10, 2019 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aaron C. Benson. Audit Systems, Inc. served on 1/7/2019, answer due 1/28/2019. (Volheim, Nathan)
January 2, 2019 Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to Audit Systems, Inc. (rpc, )
January 2, 2019 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (rpc, )
December 28, 2018 Case Assigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (rpc, )
December 28, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Taxiarchis Hatzidimitriadis on behalf of Aaron C. Benson (Hatzidimitriadis, Taxiarchis)
December 28, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Nathan Charles Volheim on behalf of Aaron C. Benson (Volheim, Nathan)
December 28, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Audit Systems, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7078289.), filed by Aaron C. Benson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Volheim, Nathan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Benson v. Audit Systems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Audit Systems, Inc.
Represented By: Nicole Marie Strickler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aaron C. Benson
Represented By: Taxiarchis Hatzidimitriadis
Represented By: Nathan Charles Volheim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?