PlasmaCAM, Inc. v. CNCElectronics, LLC, et al al
Plaintiff: PlasmaCAM, Inc.
Defendant: CNCElectronics, LLC, Thomas Lee Caudle, Fourhills Designs, LLC and Martha Jane Caudle
Case Number: 4:2019cv00037
Filed: January 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Amos L Mazzant
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summonses and First Amended Complaint served on Thomas Lee Caudle and Martha Jane Caudle on 02/07/19, filed by PlasmaCAM, Inc.. (Dvoren, Michael)
March 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and First Amended Complaint c/o Thomas Caudle, President/Director served on CNCElectronics, LLC on 02/07/19, filed by PlasmaCAM, Inc.. (Dvoren, Michael)
March 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and First Amended Complaint c/o United States Corporation Agents, Inc. served on Fourhills Designs, LLC on 02/05/19, filed by PlasmaCAM, Inc.. (Dvoren, Michael)
February 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Fourhills Designs, LLC.( Teng, Austin)
February 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re CNCElectronics, LLC, Martha Jane Caudle, Thomas Lee Caudle.( Teng, Austin)
February 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ***DEFICIENT DOCUMENT - PLEASE DISREGARD***Defendant's Unopposed First (Corrected) Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re CNCElectronics, LLC, Martha Jane Caudle, Thomas Lee Caudle, Fourhills Designs, LLC.( Teng, Austin) Modified on 2/26/2019 (baf, ).
February 26, 2019 Opinion or Order NOTICE of Deficiency regarding the UNOPPOSED APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT submitted DOCUMENT #12 - THE NUMBER OF DAYS REQUESTED EXCEEDS THE NUMBER OF DAYS THE CLERK CAN INITIALLY GRANT. Correction should be made by ONE BUSINESS DAY (baf, )
February 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Thomas Lee Caudle to 3/29/2019; Martha Jane Caudle to 3/29/2019; CNCElectronics, LLC to 3/29/2019. 29 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( baf, )
February 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Fourhills Designs, LLC to 3/28/2019. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( baf, )
February 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ***FILED IN ERROR BY ATTORNEY. PLEASE DISREGARD.***Defendants' Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re CNCElectronics, LLC, Martha Jane Caudle, Thomas Lee Caudle, Fourhills Designs, LLC.( Teng, Austin) Modified on 2/25/2019 (rlf).
January 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Maria Crimi Speth on behalf of PlasmaCAM, Inc.. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0540-7120848. (Speth, Maria)
January 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SUMMONS REISSUED as to CNCElectronics, LLC. (baf, )
January 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SUMMONS Issued as to Martha Jane Caudle. (baf, )
January 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SUMMONS Issued as to Thomas Lee Caudle. (baf, )
January 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued as to Fourhills Designs, LLC. (baf, )
January 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement against All Defendants, filed by PlasmaCAM, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Patent, #2 Exhibit B - Letter re Infringement Claim)(Dvoren, Michael)
January 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to CNCElectronics, LLC. (baf, )
January 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Dvoren, Michael)
January 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number 0540-7100431 (kls, )
January 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Case ASSIGNED to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (baf, )
January 17, 2019 Opinion or Order In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (baf, )
January 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 COMPLAINT Complaint for Patent Infringement against All Defendants, filed by PlasmaCAM, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Patent, #2 Exhibit B - Letter - Infringement Claim, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dvoren, Michael)
January 17, 2019 Opinion or Order NOTICE of Deficiency regarding the #1 Additional Attachments submitted by PlasmaCAM, Inc. "Complaint" should be the first case opening entry and filing fee must be paid. (kls, )
January 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 ***DISREGARD ENTRY - FILED IN ERROR - COMPLAINT SHOULD BE CASE OPENING EVENT - FILING FEE MUST BE PAID. Additional Attachments to Main Document: (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Report on Filing of Action re Patent, #3 PlasmaCAM, Inc. Corporate Disclosure Statement, #4 Summons(es) CNCElectronics, LLC, #5 Summons(es) Fourhills Designs, LLC, #6 Thomas and Martha Caudle)(Dvoren, Michael) Modified on 1/17/2019 (kls, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PlasmaCAM, Inc. v. CNCElectronics, LLC, et al al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CNCElectronics, LLC
Represented By: Austin Chun Teng
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas Lee Caudle
Represented By: Austin Chun Teng
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fourhills Designs, LLC
Represented By: Austin Chun Teng
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Martha Jane Caudle
Represented By: Austin Chun Teng
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PlasmaCAM, Inc.
Represented By: Maria Crimi Speth
Represented By: Michael Benjamin Dvoren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?