Boyce v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner: Justin Robert Boyce
Respondent: Lorie Davis and Director, TDCJ-CID
Case Number: 4:2019cv00155
Filed: March 5, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Amos L Mazzant
Referring Judge: Christine A Nowak
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 3, 2019 Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response by Director, TDCJ-CID. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Cosper, Craig)
April 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #4 Motion to correct petition; granting #5 Motion to correct memorandum. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 4/9/2019. (daj, )
April 8, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION to Amend/Correct #2 Additional Attachments to Main Document by Justin Robert Boyce. (Udashen, Gary)
April 8, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Justin Robert Boyce. (Udashen, Gary)
March 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - HABEAS PETITION - STATE. Respondent to file response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Copy of order to Edward Marshall and Laura Haney via electronic noticing including petition and any supporting documents. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 3/6/2019. (daj, )
March 6, 2019 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (daj, )
March 6, 2019 Case assigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III and referred to Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak. (daj, )
March 5, 2019 Filing 2 Additional Attachments (Memorandum in Suppport) to Main Document: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.. (Udashen, Gary) Modified on 3/6/2019 (daj, ).
March 5, 2019 Filing 1 First PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus By Person In State Custody, filed by Justin Robert Boyce.(Udashen, Gary)
March 5, 2019 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number TXE100018101 (mrp, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boyce v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Lorie Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Represented By: Edward Larry Marshall
Represented By: Craig William Cosper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Justin Robert Boyce
Represented By: Gary Alan Udashen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?