McKinney v. UHS of Texoma, Inc.
| Teresa R McKinney |
| UHS of Texoma, Inc. |
| 4:2019cv00427 |
| June 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Kimberly C Priest Johnson |
| Robert W Schroeder |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS. Rule 26(f) attorney conference on or before: August 26, 2019. File joint report of attorney conference: September 9, 2019. The case is SET for a Rule 16 management conference on Thursday, October 2, 2019, at 1:30 p.m. before the United States Magistrate Judge in Courtroom 108, 7940 Preston Road, Plano, Texas 75024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 8/6/2019. (daj, )
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by UHS of Texoma, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(Wolf, Tracy) |
| Filing 6 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re UHS of Texoma, Inc..( Wolf, Tracy) |
| Defendant's Unopposed SECOND Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for UHS of Texoma, Inc. to 8/2/2019. 7 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( baf, ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Tracy Graves Wolf on behalf of UHS of Texoma, Inc. (Wolf, Tracy) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for UHS of Texoma, Inc. to 7/26/2019. 21 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( baf, ) |
| Filing 4 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re UHS of Texoma, Inc..( Sedge, Brent) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER. The Court REFERS the above-styled and numbered civil action to United States Magistrate Judge Kimberly C. Priest Johnson to conduct all pretrial proceedings in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 6/12/2019. (baf, )
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to UHS of Texoma, Inc.. (baf, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UHS of Texoma, Inc. d/b/a Texoma Medical Center ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7303342.), filed by Teresa R McKinney. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2). (Hopkins, Christine) |
| Case ASSIGNED to District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III. (baf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McKinney v. UHS of Texoma, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: UHS of Texoma, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Brent Douglas Sedge |
| Represented By: | Tracy Graves Wolf |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Teresa R McKinney | |
| Represented By: | Carmen Artaza |
| Represented By: | Christine Ann Hopkins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
