Rush v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Plaintiff: Esther Rush
Defendant: Midland Credit and Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2019cv00553
Filed: July 25, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Amos L Mazzant
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER ON CLOSING DOCUMENTS. The Court has been advised by Plaintiff, through counsel, that all claims in the above-styled civil action have been settled. Therefore, it is ORDERED that, on or before October 27, 2019, all parties shall file with the Court all papers necessary for the closing of this case and its removal from the active docket of this Court. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 8/27/2019. (baf, )
August 21, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Settlement by Esther Rush (Jaffer, Shawn)
August 6, 2019 Filing 4 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Midland Credit Management, Inc..( Teters, Kevin)
August 6, 2019 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Midland Credit Management, Inc. to 8/30/2019. 14 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( rpc, )
July 26, 2019 Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Esther Rush. Midland Credit Management, Inc. served on 7/26/2019, answer due 8/16/2019. (Jaffer, Shawn)
July 25, 2019 Case ASSIGNED to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (baf, )
July 25, 2019 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (baf, )
July 25, 2019 Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to Midland Credit Management, Inc. (baf, )
July 25, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Midland Credit ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7363957.), filed by Esther Rush. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Jaffer, Shawn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rush v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Esther Rush
Represented By: Shawn Jaffer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Midland Credit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Represented By: Kevin A Teters
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?