ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. v. Marr Strength & Conditioning, LLC
| ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. |
| Marr Strength & Conditioning, LLC |
| 4:2019cv00579 |
| August 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Kimberly C Priest Johnson |
| Sean D Jordan |
| Amos L Mazzant |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (baf, ) |
| Filing 8 Original ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Marr Strength & Conditioning, LLC.(Parham, Van) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Brittany Frandsen on behalf of ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0540-7426020. (Frandsen, Brittany) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Matthew A Barlow on behalf of ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0540-7425767. (Barlow, Matthew) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by James W. McConkie, III on behalf of ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0540-7425754. (McConkie, James) |
ORDER TRANSFERRING CIVIL CASES. It is hereby ORDERED that this civil action is transferred to the Honorable Sean D. Jordan, effective immediately. Upon transfer, any pretrial referral to a Magistrate Judge is REVOKED except in Social Security cases, Pro Se Non-Prisoner/Habeas cases, and mortgage cases, where the pretrial referral will stay in place. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by United States District Judge Amos L. Mazzant. District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III and Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson no longer assigned to the case. (kls, )
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to Marr Strength & Conditioning, LLC. (daj, ) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (baf, ) |
| Filing 2 Additional Attachments to Main Document #1 Complaint:. (Jacks, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Demand for Trial by Jury against Marr Strength & Conditioning, LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7374587.), filed by ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Jacks, Thomas) |
| Case ASSIGNED to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III and REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson. (baf, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (baf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
