Hernandez et al v. Rush Enterprises, Inc. et al
| Venita Beth Hernandez and Raymond Hernandez |
| Schlumberger Limited, Schlumberger Technology Corporation, Holt Texas Ltd, Rush Enterprises, Inc. and Rush Truck Centers of Texas, LP |
| 4:2019cv00638 |
| September 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Amos L Mazzant |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 26 MOTION to Dismiss by Schlumberger Limited, Schlumberger Technology Corporation. Responses due by 11/8/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Pltf's Amended Complaint, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Tanner, Hugh) |
| Filing 25 MOTION to Dismiss by Holt Texas Ltd. Responses due by 11/8/2019 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Boland, Adam) |
| Filing 24 AMENDED ANSWER to #16 Amended Complaint by Rush Enterprises, Inc.. (Klatsky, Howard) |
| Filing 23 ANSWER to #16 Amended Complaint by Rush Truck Centers of Texas, LP.(Klatsky, Howard) |
Filing 22
ORDER. It is ORDERED that Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Dkts. #10 , #11 ) are DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 10/15/2019. (rpc, )
|
| Filing 21 SUMMONS Issued as to Rush Truck Centers of Texas, LP. (rpc, ) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Meredith Maxwell Bishop on behalf of Schlumberger Limited, Schlumberger Technology Corporation (Bishop, Meredith) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Benjamin David Williams on behalf of Schlumberger Limited, Schlumberger Technology Corporation (Williams, Benjamin) |
| Filing 18 RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to 12(b)(6) filed by Raymond Hernandez, Venita Beth Hernandez. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Denying Holt Cat's Motion to Dismiss)(Sanford, Brian) |
| Filing 17 RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint Under Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Raymond Hernandez, Venita Beth Hernandez. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Denying Schlumberger's Motion to Dismiss)(Sanford, Brian) |
| Filing 16 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Raymond Hernandez, Venita Beth Hernandez.(Sanford, Brian) |
| Filing 15 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Holt Texas Ltd (Ramirez, Sona) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 11/13/2019. Rule 16 Management Conference set for 12/2/2019 at 09:30 AM in Ctrm 208 (Sherman) before District Judge Amos L. Mazzant III. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 10/9/2019. (rpc, )
|
| Counsel are advised that the Court has not opted out of this court's Local Rules concerning courtesy copies; therefore, Counsel are asked to comply with Local Rule CV-5(a)(9) and Local Rule CV-10(b) with respect to sending courtesy copies to Judge Mazzant. Please send copies of pleadings that exceed 20 pages to Judge Mazzant's chambers, and please use tabs and dividers for exhibits. (tls) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson recused. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 10/4/2019. (rpc, )
|
| Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Schlumberger Limited, Schlumberger Technology Corporation (Tanner, Hugh) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to 12(b)(6) by Holt Texas Ltd. Responses due by 10/16/2019 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Boland, Adam) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint Under Rule 12(b)(6) by Schlumberger Limited, Schlumberger Technology Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Tanner, Hugh) |
| Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Rush Enterprises, Inc. (Klatsky, Howard) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Rush Enterprises, Inc..(Klatsky, Howard) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636 and the Local Rules of this Court for the Assignment of Matters to Magistrate Judges, the Court hereby REFERS the above-referenced case to the Hon. Kimberly C. Priest Johnson for all pretrial proceedings. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 9/10/2019. (rpc, )
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER OF RECUSAL. The undersigned judge hereby recuses himself from the above-titled and numbered cause. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 9/5/2019. (rpc, )
|
| Case Reassigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (rpc, ) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Schlumberger Technology Corporation. (rpc, ) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to Schlumberger Limited. (rpc, ) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to Holt Texas Ltd. (rpc, ) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to Rush Enterprises, Inc. (rpc, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (rpc, ) |
| Case Assigned to District Judge Sean D. Jordan. (rpc, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7420820.), filed by Raymond Hernandez, Venita Beth Hernandez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Sanford, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
