Jay v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLC
| Diana Jay |
| Specialized Loan Servicing LLC |
| 4:2019cv00680 |
| September 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Kimberly C Priest Johnson |
| Robert W Schroeder |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER AND ADVISORY re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Specialized Loan Servicing LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 10/22/2019. (baf, )
|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #3 Complaint - Defendant Specialized Loan Servicing LLC's Original Answer and Affirmative Defenses by Specialized Loan Servicing LLC.(Sparks, Jacob) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge. The Court REFERS the above-styled and numbered civil action to United States Magistrate Judge Kimberly C. Priest Johnson to conduct all pretrial proceedings in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 10/4/2019. (rpc, )
|
| Filing 3 ***COMPLAINT FILED IN STATE COURT***COMPLAINT against Specialized Loan Servicing LLC, filed by Diana Jay.(baf, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (baf, ) |
| Case ASSIGNED to District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III. (baf, ) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Specialized Loan Servicing LLC identifying Corporate Parent Computershare Limited for Specialized Loan Servicing LLC. (Sparks, Jacob) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Specialized Loan Servicing LLC from Collin County 380th District Court, case number 380-04241-2019. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7442588), filed by Specialized Loan Servicing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certified State Court Docket Sheet, #2 Exhibit B - Complaint filed in State Court, #3 Exhibit C - Civil Citation, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E - Civil Citation, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G - Property Search, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sparks, Jacob) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jay v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Specialized Loan Servicing LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jacob Ward Sparks |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Diana Jay | |
| Represented By: | Dan Earl Martens |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
