Cotton v. Kroger Texas L.P.
Creola Cotton |
Kroger Texas L.P. d/b/a Kroger and KROGER TEXAS L.P. |
4:2019cv00730 |
October 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Amos L Mazzant |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Amended ANSWER to #7 Amended Complaint by KROGER TEXAS L.P..(Ormond, John) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion re #8 First MOTION to Remand to State Court and Brief in Support of Same filed by KROGER TEXAS L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Remand)(Ormond, John) |
Set/Reset Hearings: Rule 16 Management Conference set for 1/7/2020 at 11:00 AM in Ctrm 208 (Sherman) before District Judge Amos L. Mazzant III. (rpc, ) |
Filing 9 ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 12/13/2019. Rule 16 Management Conference set for 1/7/2019 at 11:00 AM in Ctrm 208 (Sherman) before District Judge Amos L. Mazzant III. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 11/7/2019. (rpc, ) |
Filing 8 First MOTION to Remand to State Court and Brief in Support of Same by Creola Cotton. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Parry, Clayton) (Attachment 1 replaced on 11/7/2019) (rpc, ). |
Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Creola Cotton.(Parry, Clayton) |
Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Allison J. Capaul and Michael S. Fielding, attorneys for Creola Cotton, as to #5 Order. Date of delivery 10/11/2019. (baf, ) |
Filing 5 ORDER AND ADVISORY re #1 Notice of Removal. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 10/8/2019. (baf, ) |
Filing 4 ***ANSWER FILED IN STATE COURT*** ANSWER to #3 Complaint by KROGER TEXAS L.P..(baf, ) |
Filing 3 ***COMPLAINT FILED IN STATE COURT***COMPLAINT against KROGER TEXAS L.P., filed by Creola Cotton.(baf, ) |
Case ASSIGNED to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (baf, ) |
Notified Attorneys for Plaintiff Allison J. Capaul and Michael S. Fielding, Per GO 04-12, this court no longer accepts pleadings in paper form. The Clerk will no longer mail or fax notices or orders to parties. All notices and orders generated by this court shall be sent electronically. ***ATTORNEYS NOT ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN OUR COURT - ATTORNEY ADMISSION LETTER SENT VIAL EMAIL*** (baf, ) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (baf, ) |
Filing 2 NOTICE by Kroger Texas L.P. d/b/a Kroger Defendant's Certificate of Interested Persons (Ormond, John) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Kroger Texas L.P. d/b/a Kroger from 62nd District Court, Lamar County, case number 88794. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7467156), filed by Kroger Texas L.P. d/b/a Kroger. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Index of Attachments to Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit Certified Case Summary, #3 Exhibit Plaintiff's Original Petition, #4 Exhibit Defendant's Original Answer, #5 Exhibit Return of Service, #6 Exhibit Case Information Sheet, #7 Exhibit Civil Cover sheet)(Briscoe, Bryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.