Innovation Sciences, LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc.,
| Innovation Sciences, LLC |
| Amazon.Com, Inc., |
| 4:2019cv00769 |
| October 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Amos L Mazzant |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (baf, ) |
Filing 6
ORDER OF DIMSISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Having considered Plaintiff's Notice of dismissal without prejudice, the Court hereby ORDERS that all claims asserted by plaintiff Innovation Sciences, LLC are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. All relief not previously granted is hereby denied. The Clerk is directed to close this civil action. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 12/2/2019. (baf, )
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Innovation Sciences, LLC (Berquist, James) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/26/2019: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (baf, ). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by James Daniel Berquist on behalf of Innovation Sciences, LLC (Berquist, James) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Fuller, Michael) |
| Case ASSIGNED to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (baf, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (baf, ) |
| Filing 2 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Innovation Sciences, LLC. (Fuller, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Amazon.Com, Inc., ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7485650.), filed by Innovation Sciences, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - US10368125, #3 Exhibit 2 - Ltr to Amazon re new patents)(Fuller, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Innovation Sciences, LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc., | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Amazon.Com, Inc., | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Innovation Sciences, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Michael Scott Fuller |
| Represented By: | James Daniel Berquist |
| Represented By: | Christopher A Honea |
| Represented By: | Randall T Garteiser |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
