McPeters v. Paramount Recovery Systems, LP, et al
Plaintiff: Tesha McPeters
Defendant: Paramount Recovery Systems, LP and Experian Information Solutions, LLC
Case Number: 4:2019cv00813
Filed: November 8, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Amos L Mazzant
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 23, 2019 Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Paramount Recovery Systems, LP to 1/8/2020. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( baf, )
December 20, 2019 Filing 7 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Paramount Recovery Systems, LP.( Wier, William)
December 17, 2019 Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Experian Information Solutions, LLC (Hughes, Alexander)
December 17, 2019 Filing 5 DEFENSES AND ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Experian Information Solutions, LLC.(Hughes, Alexander)
December 17, 2019 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tesha McPeters. Experian Information Solutions, LLC served on 11/26/2019, answer due 12/17/2019. (Motil, Gregory)
November 8, 2019 Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to Experian Information Solutions, LLC. (baf, )
November 8, 2019 Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to Paramount Recovery Systems, LP. (baf, )
November 8, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7516037.), filed by Tesha McPeters. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Dispute Letter, #3 Exhibit Credit Report)(Motil, Gregory)
November 8, 2019 Case ASSIGNED to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (baf, )
November 8, 2019 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (baf, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McPeters v. Paramount Recovery Systems, LP, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paramount Recovery Systems, LP
Represented By: William Keith Wier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, LLC
Represented By: Alexander Giomi Hughes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tesha McPeters
Represented By: Joel Spencer Halvorsen
Represented By: Gregory Stephen Motil
Represented By: Gregory Michael Klote
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?