Qwikcash, LLC v. Blackhawk Network Holdings, Inc. et al
| Qwikcash, LLC |
| Blackhawk Network, Inc., Blackhawk Network Holdings, Inc. and Blackhawk Network California, Inc. |
| 4:2019cv00876 |
| November 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Sean D Jordan |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss by Blackhawk Network California, Inc., Blackhawk Network Holdings, Inc., Blackhawk Network, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Mueller, Jason) |
| Filing 10 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Blackhawk Network California, Inc., Blackhawk Network Holdings, Inc., Blackhawk Network, Inc.( Mueller, Jason) |
| Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Blackhawk Network California, Inc. to 1/22/2020; Blackhawk Network, Inc. to 1/22/2020; Blackhawk Network Holdings, Inc. to 1/22/2020. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( rpc, ) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Qwikcash, LLC. All Plaintiffs. (Niro, Raymond) |
| Filing 8 ***PLEASE DISREGARD. INCORRECT DOCKET EVENT USED*** AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summonses, Complaint, and Exhibits A-E to Complaint served on Defendants Blackhawk Network Holdings, Inc., Blackhawk Network, Inc., and Blackhawk Network California, Inc. on December 2, 2019, filed by Qwikcash, LLC. (Niro, Raymond) Modified on 12/6/2019 (rpc, ). |
| NOTICE of Deficiency regarding the #8 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summonses submitted by Qwikcash, LLC. The documents should be filed using event Summons Returned Executed. Correction should be made by one business day. (rpc, ) |
| Answer Due Deadline Updated for Blackhawk Network California, Inc. to 12/23/2019; Blackhawk Network Holdings, Inc. to 12/23/2019; Blackhawk Network, Inc. to 12/23/2019. (rpc, ) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Issued as to Blackhawk Network California, Inc. (rpc, ) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued as to Blackhawk Network, Inc. (rpc, ) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Blackhawk Network Holdings, Inc. (rpc, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Kyle David Wallenberg on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Wallenberg, Kyle) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Matthew George McAndrews on behalf of All Plaintiffs (McAndrews, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Niro, Raymond) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7546180.), filed by Qwikcash, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Niro, Raymond) |
| Case Assigned to District Judge Sean D. Jordan. (rpc, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (rpc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
