Marker v. Dynamic Recovery Solutions LLC
| Robert Marker |
| Dynamic Recovery Solutions, LLC |
| 4:2019cv00948 |
| December 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Christine A Nowak |
| Robert W Schroeder |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER. It is ORDERED that, on or before April 6, 2020, the Parties shall submit to the Court all papers necessary for the closing of this case and its removal from the active docket of the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 2/21/2020. (rpc, )
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Settlement by Robert Marker (Badwan, Mohammed) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to file a notice that the case is ready for a scheduling conference when the Defendant has either answered or filed a motion to transfer or dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 12/30/2019. (rpc, )
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER. The Court REFERS the above-styled and numbered civil action to United States Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak to conduct all pretrial proceedings in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 12/30/2019. (rpc, )
|
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Robert Marker. Dynamic Recovery Solutions, LLC waiver sent on 12/30/2019, answer due 2/28/2020. (Davidson, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Mohammed Omar Badwan on behalf of Robert Marker (Badwan, Mohammed) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Joseph Scott Davidson on behalf of Robert Marker (Davidson, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dynamic Recovery Solutions LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7587129.), filed by Robert Marker. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Davidson, Joseph) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (rpc, ) |
| Case Assigned to District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III. (rpc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Marker v. Dynamic Recovery Solutions LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert Marker | |
| Represented By: | Mohammed Omar Badwan |
| Represented By: | Joseph Scott Davidson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dynamic Recovery Solutions, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
