Cunningham v. Assured Auto Group, Inc. et al
| Craig Cunningham |
| National Auto Protection Corp., John/Jane Does 1 - 5, Northcoast Warranty Services, Inc., Gustav Renny, Assured Auto Group, Inc., William Finneran and Sunpath, LTD |
| 4:2020cv00141 |
| February 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Kimberly C Priest Johnson |
| Robert W Schroeder |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MOTION to Dismiss by Northcoast Warranty Services, Inc., Sunpath, LTD. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Garcia, #2 Declaration of Moses, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Weiss, Jason) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Biniam T. Tesfamariam on behalf of Northcoast Warranty Services, Inc., Sunpath, LTD. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0540-7755866. (Tesfamariam, Biniam) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Joseph P. Bowser on behalf of Northcoast Warranty Services, Inc., Sunpath, LTD. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0540-7755817. (Bowser, Joseph) |
| Filing 12 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Northcoast Warranty Services, Inc..( Weiss, Jason) |
| Filing 11 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Sunpath, LTD.( Weiss, Jason) |
| Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Northcoast Warranty Services, Inc. to 4/24/2020. 9 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( rpc, ) |
| Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Sunpath, LTD to 4/24/2020. 29 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( rpc, ) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Craig Cunningham. Sunpath, LTD served on 3/5/2020, answer due 3/26/2020. (rpc, ) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Craig Cunningham. National Auto Protection Corp. served on 3/6/2020, answer due 3/27/2020. (rpc, ) |
| Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number TXE600051489. (ksd) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Issued as to William Finneran. (daj, ) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Issued as to Sunpath, LTD. (daj, ) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued as to Northcoast Warranty Services, Inc.. (daj, ) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to National Auto Protection Corp.. (daj, ) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to Gustav Renny. (daj, ) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to Assured Auto Group, Inc.. (daj, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III and referred to Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate referral) (daj, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Craig Cunningham. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(daj, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. **Consent form mailed to plaintiff. (daj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
