SHUMAN v. GC Services, LP
| STEPHEN SHUMAN |
| GC Services, LP |
| 4:2020cv00503 |
| July 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Sean D Jordan |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER ON CLOSING DOCUMENTS AND STAYING DEADLINES. ORDERED that, on or before October 12, 2020, all parties shall file with the Court all papers necessary for the closing of this case and its removal from the active docket of this Court. It is further ORDERED that any deadlines scheduled in this matter are STAYED pending the resolution of the case. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 8/28/2020. (kls, )
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Settlement by STEPHEN SHUMAN (Hill, Adam) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for GC Services, LP to 9/9/2020. 14 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( baf, ) |
| Filing 5 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re GC Services, LP.( Rudnicki, Leah) |
| Filing 4 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re GC Services, LP.( Rudnicki, Leah) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for GC Services, LP to 8/26/2020. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( baf, ) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by STEPHEN SHUMAN. GC Services, LP served on 7/6/2020, answer due 7/27/2020. (Hill, Adam) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to GC Services, LP. (baf, ) |
| Case ASSIGNED to District Judge Sean D. Jordan. (baf, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (baf, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GC Services, LP ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7870424.), filed by STEPHEN SHUMAN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, )(Hill, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: SHUMAN v. GC Services, LP | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: STEPHEN SHUMAN | |
| Represented By: | Adam Theodore Hill |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: GC Services, LP | |
| Represented By: | Leah Thomas Rudnicki |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
