DEGENHARDT v. AMERASSIST A/R SOLUTIONS, INC et al
BRIAN DEGENHARDT |
AMERASSIST A/R SOLUTIONS, INC and Dental Office of Prosper, PC, |
4:2020cv00579 |
July 29, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Amos L Mazzant |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Dental Office of Prosper, PC, identifying Corporate Parent Pacific Dental Services for Dental Office of Prosper, PC,. (Alfred, Michael) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint and Brief in Support by Dental Office of Prosper, PC,. Responses due by 9/29/2020 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Alfred, Michael) |
Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by AMERASSIST A/R SOLUTIONS, INC identifying Corporate Parent Amerassist Holding Company for AMERASSIST A/R SOLUTIONS, INC. (Malone, Robbie) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by AMERASSIST A/R SOLUTIONS, INC.(Malone, Robbie) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (baf, ) |
Filing 7 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Dental Office of Prosper, PC,.( Alfred, Michael) |
Defendant's Unopposed SECOND Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Dental Office of Prosper, PC, to 9/15/2020. 6 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( baf, ) |
Filing 6 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Dental Office of Prosper, PC,.( Alfred, Michael) |
Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Dental Office of Prosper, PC, to 9/9/2020. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( baf, ) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by BRIAN DEGENHARDT. Dental Office of Prosper, PC, served on 8/4/2020, answer due 8/25/2020. (Jaffer, Shawn) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by BRIAN DEGENHARDT. AMERASSIST A/R SOLUTIONS, INC served on 8/4/2020, answer due 8/25/2020. (Jaffer, Shawn) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to Dental Office of Prosper, PC,. (baf, ) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to AMERASSIST A/R SOLUTIONS, INC. (baf, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7917014.), filed by BRIAN DEGENHARDT. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Jaffer, Shawn) |
Case ASSIGNED to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (baf, ) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (baf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.