Ortiz Garcia v. Fannin County Detention Center
| Jose Luis Ortiz Garcia |
| Fannin County Detention Center |
| 4:2020cv00932 |
| December 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Kimberly C Priest Johnson |
| Amos L Mazzant |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER. It is ORDERED the Clerk of Court shall issue process and Respondent shall have sixty days to show cause why the writ should not be granted or to otherwise plead. Furthermore, although it is not required, it is ORDERED that Petitioner has twenty-one days from the date the Response is filed in which to file a Reply, if so desired. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 1/25/2021. (kls, )
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER denying as moot #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 1/25/2021. (kls, )
|
| Filing 6 Letter from Petitioner Jose Luis Garcia (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s)) (kls, ) |
| Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number TXE600055261. (ksd ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER. ORDERED that Petitioner has thirty days from the receipt of this Order to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or submit an in forma pauperis data sheet. ORDERED that the Clerk shall not accept any other documents in this case, except for a motion for an extension of time, until Petitioner complies with this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson on 12/10/2020. (daj, )
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jose Luis Ortiz Garcia. (daj, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III and referred to Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate referral) (daj, ) (Main Document 2 replaced on 12/7/2020) (daj, ). |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2241 (TXWD No. DR-19-CR-2074(1)), filed by Jose Luis Ortiz Garcia. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Envelope(s))(daj, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. **Consent form mailed to petitioner. (daj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ortiz Garcia v. Fannin County Detention Center | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Fannin County Detention Center | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jose Luis Ortiz Garcia | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
