Robinson v. State Farm Lloyds
Denitra L Robinson |
State Farm Lloyds |
4:2021cv00035 |
January 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Sean D Jordan |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ANSWER to #9 Amended Complaint by State Farm Lloyds.(Sapp, Matthew) |
Filing 10 ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 3/30/2021. Rule 16 Management Conference set for 4/14/2021at 01:00 PM in Ctrm 105 (Plano) before District Judge Sean D. Jordan. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 2/24/2021. (mem) |
Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against State Farm Lloyds, filed by Denitra L Robinson.(Green, Donald) |
Filing 8 NOTICE by Denitra L Robinson of Plaintiff's Certificate of Interested Persons (Green, Donald) |
Filing 7 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Denitra L Robinson. (Green, Donald) |
Filing 6 ORDER AND ADVISORY. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 1/21/2021. (mem) |
Filing 5 ***ANSWER FILED IN STATE COURT*** ANSWER to #4 Complaint by State Farm Lloyds.(baf, ) |
Filing 4 ***COMPLAINT FILED IN STATE COURT***Complaint against State Farm Lloyds, filed by Denitra L Robinson.(baf, ) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Matthew Clay Sapp on behalf of State Farm Lloyds (Sapp, Matthew) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by State Farm Lloyds (Rambin, W) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by State Farm Lloyds from 429th Judicial District Court of Collin County, case number 429-06473-2020. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8198990), filed by State Farm Lloyds. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G)(Rambin, W) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (baf, ) |
Case ASSIGNED to District Judge Sean D. Jordan. (baf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Robinson v. State Farm Lloyds | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: State Farm Lloyds | |
Represented By: | Matthew Clay Sapp |
Represented By: | W Neil Rambin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Denitra L Robinson | |
Represented By: | Donald Clinton Green, II |
Represented By: | Richard D Daly |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.