Hunnel v. Director, TDCJ-CID
| Ronnie Jay Hunnel |
| Director, TDCJ-CID |
| 4:2021cv00065 |
| January 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Sean D Jordan |
| Christine A Nowak |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Casey Leigh Jackson-Solomon on behalf of Director, TDCJ-CID (Jackson-Solomon, Casey) |
| Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Ronnie Jay Hunnel as to #4 Order, Set/Clear Flags. (baf, ) |
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - HABEAS PETITION - STATE. Respondent to file response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Copy of order to Edward Marshall and Laura Haney via electronic noticing including petition and any supporting documents. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 2/11/2021. (baf, )
|
| Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 6-55694 (mll, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Petitioner has thirty days from the receipt of this Order to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis, together with an in forma pauperis data sheet. It is ORDERED that the Clerk shall not accept any other documents in this case, except for a motion for an extension of time, until Petitioner complies with this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak on 1/26/2021. (mem)
|
| Filing 3 Case assigned to District Judge Sean D. Jordan and referred to Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate referral) (daj, ) |
| Filing 2 BRIEF - Writ of Habeas Corpus - In the Interest of Justice, filed by Ronnie Jay Hunnel. (daj, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fannin County Court No. CR-16-25714), filed by Ronnie Jay Hunnel. ***Severed from case no. 4:21cv10, originally filed 12/31/2020***(daj, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. **Consent form mailed to petitioner. (daj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hunnel v. Director, TDCJ-CID | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID | |
| Represented By: | Edward Larry Marshall |
| Represented By: | Casey Leigh Jackson-Solomon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Ronnie Jay Hunnel | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
